{"id":370,"date":"2017-01-13T17:15:32","date_gmt":"2017-01-13T17:15:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/library19.providence.edu\/fhertr\/?p=370"},"modified":"2017-01-13T17:15:32","modified_gmt":"2017-01-13T17:15:32","slug":"unc-analysis-of-high-tuition-high-aid-model","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/2017\/01\/13\/unc-analysis-of-high-tuition-high-aid-model\/","title":{"rendered":"UNC Analysis of High Tuition\/ High Aid Model"},"content":{"rendered":"
HIGH TUITION\/HIGH AID: CLASSIC ARGUMENTS<\/div>\n
PRO:<\/div>\n
1. Increasing tuition is good public policy<\/div>\n
2. States charge students less than what it actually costs to educate a student<\/div>\n
3. This creates a subsidy for students regardless of need or family ability to pay<\/div>\n
4.This is:<\/div>\n
a)Inefficient \u2013 because a large number of students and families who do not<\/div>\n
need the subsidy receive it;<\/div>\n
b) Inequitable — because it spends more money on the middle class and well-<\/div>\n
off than on low-income individuals<\/div>\n
3. High tuition approach necessitates a high financial aid response<\/div>\n
a) to preserve equal opportunity for low-income and disadvantaged students<\/div>\n
b) to promote access with students who might otherwise self-preclude<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
CON:<\/div>\n
1. Thinks that public subsidies should be distributed broadly through low tuition,<\/div>\n
rather than targeting them;<\/div>\n
2. Views society as the primary beneficiary of public expenditures on higher<\/div>\n
education;<\/div>\n
3. Subsidizes the education of all enrolled students regardless of financial need;<\/div>\n
4. Increases signal:<\/div>\n
a) an erosion to educational equity and opportunity for the poor and the<\/div>\n
middle class who downgrade their educational choices, or<\/div>\n
b) opt out of higher education altogether<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.unc.edu\/~jfstewar\/home\/tuition\/tuition_aid.pdf<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

HIGH TUITION\/HIGH AID: CLASSIC ARGUMENTS PRO: 1. Increasing tuition is good public policy 2. States charge students less than what it actually costs to educate a student 3. This creates a subsidy for students regardless of need or family ability to pay 4.This is: a)Inefficient \u2013 because a large number of students and families who … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[11,12],"class_list":["post-370","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","tag-high-cost-high-aid","tag-tuition"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/370","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=370"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/370\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=370"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/library.providence.edu\/fhertr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}